<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I think your web site and api could use a new sort algorithm - most relevant]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Basically matching on how much of your search matches the item.  So full matches to say 'cell' would come up if it was an exact match, so usually it's number of matching letters/words over whole letters/word count - so percentage etc.  REALLY makes the UI come alive vs right now it's a search on each word, which is good - but the 'real match' is oten rows down the screen.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.uno.gs/topic/188/i-think-your-web-site-and-api-could-use-a-new-sort-algorithm-most-relevant</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 12:17:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.uno.gs/topic/188.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2020 23:43:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think your web site and api could use a new sort algorithm - most relevant on Fri, 01 May 2020 16:11:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Already has relevance sort, duh!  Somehow I missed that, sorry!!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.uno.gs/post/750</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.uno.gs/post/750</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mshiels]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 16:11:29 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>